The Electoral College vote will be 279-259.
Friday, October 31, 2008
McCain Will Win on Tuesday
The Electoral College vote will be 279-259.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Joe Perry Confesses: I'm For McCain!
Mooners Break Glass With Their Butts
Mouse Head Found in Frozen Vegetables
Cook Wipes Butt With Burger; Gargles With Lettuce
Two cooks at a Burnet, Texas restaurant were arrested Monday for tainting a hamburger prepared for the Burnet Police Department chief. According to his arrest affidavit, Jaime Perez, 23, told a friend he wiped himself (the rectal area) with a hamburger bun he was serving Police Chief Paul Nelson at a restaurant called Andy's Landing. Perez also said he put the veggies in his mouth before placing them on the burger and proceeding to spit and blow his nose on it.
The citizen told Chief Nelson who filed a complaint with the Burnet County's Sheriff's Office. The Chief recalled seeing Perez along with another cook, James Ledesma, standing behind the counter watching him eat his food that day.
"Jaime is our best cook," said Andy's Landing General Manager Tiffany Tappe. "It's the last thing we ever expected."
James Ledesma, accomplice
Dead Mouse Found in Block of Cheese
"He kind of got to just about the middle and as he cut, he noticed what looked like fur." He immediately took the cheese, a few pieces already gone, from the children. They hadn't eaten any of the cheese from near the mouse, and they didn't get sick.
Man Jailed For Getting Extra Helping of Food at Buffet
Even the Woman Who Defiled the Lincoln Bedroom Defends GOP
Bloodworth-Thomason and others seemed especially critical of the way MSNBC — and other media — has attacked Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin while demeaning her supporters.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Lurch's Plan to Save Gas Money BACKFIRES
Obama Speechwriter Quits, Vows to Vote for McCain!!!
Obama Will Take Away Our Guns
B. Hussein Obama, like all left wing politicians, wants to take away our Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms, because it is the one thing that prevents the lefties of Democratic Party from imposing their totalitarian will on the rest of us. The fact that the right to have a gun was second on the list of the Bill of Rights is pretty compelling evidence that it was an important thing to clarify.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Aussi Eatery Puts Dung in Ice Cream of Complaining Customer
The laboratory report by the Federal Government's National Measurement Institute confirms that the matter served to the Whyte family - and partly consumed by Mr Whyte's wife, Jessica - "has an offensive odor and physical properties similar to human excreta."
Monday, October 27, 2008
Liberals Lynch Sarah Palin in Effigy - Where is the Outrage?
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Friday, October 24, 2008
Democrats Propose New Flag
The proposed new flag.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Woman Lies About Attack
The Rules of Engagement
OFF LIMITS:
Obama’s use of illegal drugs
Obama’s friendship with convicted felon Tony Resko
Obama’s friendship with terrorist William Ayers
Obama’s mockery of Christianity
Obama’s use of courts to remove opponents from the ballot
Obama’s vote to raise taxes on those making $42,000
Obama’s education at Islamic schools
Obama's friendship with Rev. Wright
Obama's friendship with Farhakhan
Obama’s broken pledge to debate with McCain
Obama’s broken pledge to take public financing
Obama’s ties to the corrupt Chicago Political Machine
Obama’s extravagant lifestyle
Obama’s receipt of campaign contributions from Fannie/Freddie
Michelle Obama’s wardrobe paid for by Hollywood designers
Michelle Obama’s racist college thesis
Michelle Obama’s anti-American rhetoric
McCain’s heroism in Viet Nam
McCain’s opposition to Fannie/Freddie 4 years ago
Palin’s successful record as governor of Alaska
People wearing "Abort Sarah" shirts at Obama rallies
CNN's misrepresentation of NR Online's characterization of Palin
Obama's travel expenses for his kids
FAIR GAME:
Cindy McCain’s addition to prescription pain killers
The cost of Sarah Palin’s wardrobe
Palin's travel expenses for her kids
Trooper-gate
Whether Palin lied about her pregnancy
Whether someone shouted "kill him" during a McCain campaign rally
Interviewing McCain’s torturer to see "what really happened"
Obama’s charm and magnetism
Michelle Obama’s beauty and grace
Borking - 21 Years Ago
On this day in 1987, the Democratic Party began their long descent into what is now know as the "politics of personal destruction." Perhaps the most qualified man to have been nominated to the Supreme Court, Robert Bork, was "Borked" by an onslaught of radical lefties who snooped through every aspect of his personal life. They even paid a local video rental business to release a list all the movies Robert Bork had rented, hoping against hope that a porno would be among them. None found. Other victims of the Democratic invention of Borking: John Tower, Clarence Thomas, Sarah Palin, and most GOP nominees to the Supreme Court.
On a happy note, about a month after Robert Bork's nomination was rejected by the Senate, I was walking to class along Pauley Pavillion at UCLA. And who should I see walking toward me?
Wearing a headband, sneakers, shorts, and a T-shirt was California's own Keating 5 Senator Alan Cranston!
I had seen him on campus before, using our campus gym facilities for free, not doubt. As I approached him, I quickly raised by arm and gave him a big 1-finger salute, and kept it going for the entire 20 feet or so the I had left on my approach. He glared at me with a look of shock and confusion. "That one is for Robert Bork," I whispered to myself as I walked away. I never saw the walking skelleton in person again, so I'm glad my 20 year old, immature self seized the moment.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Fat Man Tries to Sneak Drugs in Jail
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:
I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.
It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.
What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.
They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."
Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?" ( http://snipurl.com/457to] ): "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."
These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.
Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!
What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?
Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.
And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.
If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.
But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.
You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.
If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.
If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.
Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper.
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.
If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.
Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means . That's how trust is earned.
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.
Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.
So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means?
Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?
You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.
That's where you are right now.
It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.
If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.
Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.
You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.
This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.
If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.
If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.
Doh! Liberal Poll Backfires
vs.
The left-leaning Pew Research Center conducted a survey to see what the audiences of the various political shows knew about politics and what they found goes against the Drive-By Liberal News Media’s "conventional wisdom" about whose audience is better informed about current events. With a simple three-question survey about politicians of high office, it turned out that the audiences of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity answered correctly more than did that of the Colbert Report, Daily Show and CNN.
They were asked these simple questions:
1. Which political party controls the House?
2. Who is the Secretary of State?
3. Who is the PM of Great Britain?
The percentage of the audience who correctly answered these three questions are:
Sean Hannity- 84%, 73%, 49%
Rush Limbaugh - 84%, 73%, 41%
NPR - 73%, 72%, 57% (of course they are more interested in Europe)
Colbert Report - 73%, 65%, 49%
C-SPAN - 63%, 59%, 35%
CNN - 59%, 48%, 29%
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Old Hag Arrested
More From the Looney Left
You never see Republic protesters do things like this. Yet the Drive-By's, Obama, and Powell say the McCain campaign and its supporters are the negative ones.
Magic Mountain: RUINED
(Not actual photo -- reinactment by paid actors)
(This sign would have prevented Lurch from spilling his Coke)
To be fair, back in 1990 when this incident ocurred, the scientific community had not yet reached a consensus on the connection between liquid dynamics and roller coasters. So the science wasn’t yet out there to put Lurch on notice that bringing a drink on a roller coaster was not a good idea.
Monday, October 20, 2008
My Cancellation Letter to Men's Health
Mrs. Barack Obama and Mrs. Louis Farrakhan
Explain This, Barack Hussein Obama!!
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Colon Powell - Unprincipled Backstabber
Later, when questioned by a reporter from the Howard Stern Show, Powell admitted he is also voting for Obama because he agrees with Obama's anti-abortion position, Obama's pledge to keep the troops in Iraq for several more years, and because he thinks Sarah Palin will make a good vice-president.
McCain v. Obama Policy Differences
McCain - Vowed not to raise taxes; may reduce taxes.
Obama - Vowed to raise taxes on individuals and small businesses making more than $250,000.
SPENDING
McCain - Will freeze spending and veto pork barrel and earmark spending.
Obama - Will increase spending on social programs and expanding federal entitlement spending.
ABORTION
McCain - Opposes abortion, favors adoption alternative.
Obama - Encourages late term abortions at 8 1/2 months, no restrictions.
RELIGION
McCain - States his political views are shaped by his Christian beliefs.
Obama - Declared, "Whatever it once was, this is not a Christian nation anymore." Says, 'under God' should be removed from Pledge of Allegiance; mocks people with religious beliefs when speaking privately to liberal audiences.
PATRIOTISM
McCain - Served country in Navy, POW camp, proud of his country.
Obama - Refuses to place hand over heart during Pledge; wife says America is 'downright mean' and not proud of America.
FOREIGN POLICY
McCain - Would use military to protect U.S. interests and in areas where U.S. can make the outcome better.
Obama - Says there is "nothing special about the U.S., " and vows to sit down and negotiate with terrorists.
IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN
McCain - Suports the surge in both countries, vows troops will return home after victory.
Obama - Opposes use of military force, vows to withdraw troops in 16 months regardless of conditions.
IRAN/NORTH KOREA
McCain - Will not allow them to obtain nuclear weapons. Favors multilateral sanctions.
Obama - Favors sharing nuclear technology, direct diplomacy, meeting without preconditions.
ENERGY
McCain - Supports drilling, nuclear energey, tax credits to auto companies who develop zero-emission cars.
Obama - Supports subsidies to solar and wind energy. Opposes nuclear and oil.
HEALTHCARE
McCain - Would allow insurance companies to sell across state lines; tax credits for health insurance premiums.
Obama - Government operated, mandated universal health care like Canada and UK.
CAPITALISM
McCain - People should keep what they earn with minimal taxes; encourages private charity.
Obama - Spread the wealth around so everyone can benefit from other people's work and innovation.
GUNS
McCain - The Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to own and posess guns for protection.
Obama - Only the government and military can own guns; favors banning private gun ownership.
ISRAEL
McCain - Favors a Palestinian state while preserving Israel.
Obama - Says the U.S. is "too close" with Israel, favors sanctions against Israel.
Friday, October 17, 2008
8 Years Ago: "Do You Support Dingle-Norwood?"
8 years ago today, George W. Bush won the election when he gave Al "The Stalker" Gore a quick nod when Gore tried to get in his face during the town hall debate.
Bagel Order: RUINED
He turned on his computer and tuned into a conservative-viewpoint based radio program.Then, he slowley took out the bagel from the white paper bag.
They will pay . . . They will pay . . . .